Loading
You searched for cases with the following details ;
Courts
Filter Case Year : 2004. Court Name : High Court at Nyeri.
MATHEW KIPNGENO ARAP CHELULE V STEPHEN LOGOS & ANOTHER [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Suit 32 of 2003 |
Date Delivered: 10 Dec 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: MATHEW KIPNGENO ARAP CHELULE v STEPHEN LOGOS & another
Advocates:
Citation: MATHEW KIPNGENO ARAP CHELULE v STEPHEN LOGOS & ANOTHER [2004] eKLR
Land Law-title-where the dispute over the land was heard and determined by the Land Disputes Tribunal but the award was not reflected on the map-remedies available to the aggrieved party
Read More
Mathew Kipngeno Arap Chelule V Stephen Logos [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Suit 32 of 2003 |
Date Delivered: 10 Dec 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: Mathew Kipngeno Arap Chelule v Stephen Logos,Bomet District Land Registrar
Advocates:
Citation: Mathew Kipngeno Arap Chelule v Stephen Logos [2004] eKLR
Read More
Toei & Another V Tuei & 4 Others [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Suit 52 of 2004 |
Date Delivered: 26 Nov 2004 |
Judge: Daniel Kiio Musinga
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: Joel Kipkemoi Toei,Isaac Kiprono Busienei v Recho C Tuei,Sarah C Tuei,Reuben Kiprono Tuei,Azaria Kipkemoi Tuei & Henry Kipkemoi Arap Towett
Advocates:
Citation: Toei & another v Tuei & 4 others [2004] eKLR
(RULING) - urgent application for temporary injunction - chamber summons or notice of motion to be precise,comprehensible and to disclose orders sought without difficult - application struck out
Read More
Korokwony Company Ltd & Another V Kimeto & 2 Others [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Suit 20 of 1999 |
Date Delivered: 19 Nov 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: Korokwony Company Ltd; Korokwony Women Group (Suing through its Officials: Mrs. Priscilla C Tesot (Chairlady); Esther Koromicha (Secretary) & Alice Koskei (Treasurer) v Everline Kimeto; Lydia Ngeno & Mrs Elizabeth Salat t/a Korokwony Women Group
Advocates:
Citation: Korokwony Company Ltd & another v Kimeto & 2 others [2004] eKLR
Civil Procedure - application for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the defendants from taking over as officials of a women's group - allegation that election of officials was irregular and illegal - court surmising that the real issue in controversy was the leadership of the group and an injunction would not resolve the dispute - court making the orders necessary to address dispute.
Read More
Mau Tea Multi-Purpose Co-operative Society Ltd & Another V Webster & Another [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Suit No 43 of 2004 |
Date Delivered: 29 Oct 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: Mau Tea Multi-Purpose Co-operative Society Ltd (formerly Mau Tea Estate Co. Ltd)& James Finlay (K) Ltd (formerly African Highlands Produce Co. Ltd) v Carolyne Webster & Rural Initiative Programme
Advocates:
Citation: Mau Tea Multi-Purpose Co-operative Society Ltd & another v Webster & another [2004] eKLR
Civil Procedure - application for mandatory injunction- conditions that must be fulfilled before a court can grant such injunction - affidavit - parties who may swear an affidavit on behalf of a corporation
Read More
African Highlands Produce Co. Ltd V Collins Moseti Ontweka [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Appeal 38 of 2002 |
Date Delivered: 29 Oct 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: African Highlands Produce Co. Ltd v Collins Moseti Ontweka
Advocates:
Citation: African Highlands Produce Co. Ltd v Collins Moseti Ontweka [2004] eKLR
Civil Procedure - application for dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution - Civil Procedure Rules Order XLI rule 31(2) empowering Registrar to list a matter for dismissal where appeal is not set down for hearing one year after service of the memorandum of appeal - whether the provision empowers a party to file an application for dismissal
Read More
Chumo V Kerich [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Appeal No 4 of 2003 |
Date Delivered: 29 Oct 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: Kipkoech Chumo v Joel Kiprotich Kerich
Advocates:
Citation: Chumo v Kerich [2004] eKLR
Civil Procedure - application to set aside an order dismissing an application -application dismissed for want of prosecution after counsel failed to attend court - order not to be set aside where counsel fails to give an explanation for his failure to attend court
Read More
Rutto V Maiga [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Miscellaneous Civil Application No 7of 1993 |
Date Delivered: 29 Oct 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: Kimutai Rutto v Chebukto Arap Maiga
Advocates:
Citation: Rutto v Maiga [2004] eKLR
Civil Procedure - review - application for review and setting aside of court order - duty of applicant to state clearly the order which he seeks to review - duty of party to annex the decree appealed from - court cannot review an order which was never issued
Read More
James Achoka Omae & Another V Joseph Kirui & Another [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Suit 2 of 2001 |
Date Delivered: 29 Oct 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: Omae & Josephine Chepkurui Omae v Kirui & Wesley Tangus Boy
Advocates:
Citation: James Achoka Omae & another v Joseph Kirui & another [2004] eKLR
Running Down Cause - Damages - general damages - for loss of dependency - duty of plaintiff to establish dependency - where deceased person died at the age of thirty six years - matters the court will consider in assessing the proper multiplier
Read More
John Kiprotich Langat V Samuel K Maiywa [2004] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Case No 6 of 2000 |
Date Delivered: 29 Oct 2004 |
Judge: Luka Kiprotich Kimaru
Court: High Court at Kericho
Parties: John Kiprotich Langat v Samuel K Maiywa
Advocates:
Citation: John Kiprotich Langat v Samuel K Maiywa [2004] eKLR
Civil Procedure - limitation of action - plea of limitation in an action for the recovery of land - whether plea can be allowed where the pleadings and parties are in dispute on the period in which the action ought to have been brought - plea disallowed - applicant at liberty to raise plea of limitation in the main hearing.
Read More